"These" judges performance
photo fileThe stories of these judges are also strange. Rana Sanaullah had a secret and personal meeting with my Lord Sheikh Azmat Saeed and said, "There is a lot of pressure, ask Nawaz Sharif to resign from the Supreme Court and appear in the court." The head of General Zaheer Islam sent a message asking him to resign.
Where Nawaz Sharif was going to stop, he went to GHQ and asked General Raheel Sharif in a crowded meeting that can a subordinate officer send a message to the Chief Executive to resign? there was no answer on Nawaz Sharif's question.
It is mentioned at that time that the Prime Minister was informed by his intelligence agency that a group of judges was actively working against him and wanted to punish him anyway. Khyal has also contacted the generals and told them that we are being disrespected day by day, please stop Nawaz Sharif from this.
The truth is that some generals of Muqtadara and Sarpanch of Judiciary have been working together against politicians from the past until recently. Every time, Muqtadar used to present such a narrative to the judiciary which would create tension between him and the politicians.
At the time of removing Nawaz Sharif, the judiciary was told that PML-N was going to legislate reforms in the judiciary, which would harm many judges and the powers of the judiciary.
A powerful agency informed the judges that the draft law was recovered from the laptop of the then Federal Minister for Law Zahid Hamid. Later, General Bajwa told Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi in a meeting while mentioning the red lines of the then ruling party that if legislation is passed against judges and judiciary, the army will immediately take over the system of the country.
For the first time in the history of Pakistan, during the hearing of the Panama case, the same judges decided to include the serving officers of the Military Intelligence and ISI in the investigation, then this matter was discussed in the Corps Commanders meeting, General Bajwa these days. had some sympathy with Sharif, though later changed.
General Bajwa suggested in the Corps Commanders meeting that Military Intelligence and ISI should not be part of the Joint Investigation Team, on this the 4-3 Corps Commanders who were at odds with Nawaz Sharif and General Zaheer Islam and These judges were of the same opinion, they said in Punjabi "Bharu (scapegoat) hath aya hawa ai ehanno jaan na deo" Consistent with the same corps commanders, General Bajwa said nothing on this subject and let the army officers prepare the material for the judges.
While Justice Khosa was in the Lahore High Court, he used to talk about the constitution and democracy, then he harbored a personal grudge. Muqtadara told him that the Muslim League-N was going to enact legislation to stop your Chief Justice, the generals have stopped it. Saqib Nisar also took shots out of the wicket, it is said that he was used by Justice Khosa, the pistachio tall Justice Khosa was greatly influenced by his father-in-law Justice Naseem Hasan Shah, Naseem Hasan in an interview with me in 1996. I first mentioned pressure in the Bhutto case and then wrote articles on several episodes in response to this interview published in Daily Jang.
The brother of Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, who resigned recently, was employed in a high-ranking position in Itteafaq Foundry. When Hussain Nawaz became the head of Aqash Group, he dismissed him from his job. The Sharif family believes that there is a knot in the heart of Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan since that time, This was my Lord who used to call Judge Arshad Malik and ask him to give maximum punishment to Nawaz Sharif. Sharif family has the video recording of Judge Arshad Malik to give maximum sentence to Nawaz Sharif.
Sources of the Sharif family believe that Justice Saqib Nisar turned against him because he was delayed in becoming the Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court, while Saqib Nisar's close friends tell a long story of bad relations, they also say that his It was not the Sharif family but Chief Justice Mian Mehboob's role in not becoming a judge.'
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's Principal Secretary Fawad Hasan Fawad said that President Tarar confirmed Justice Khosa but not Saqib Nisar even though the Prime Minister had approved the confirmation of both.
The Prime Minister sent one of his bureaucratic advisers to President Tarar to confirm Saqib Nisar as well, but President Tarar did not agree. Sources close to Justice Saqib Nisar confirmed that President Tarar made an illegal recommendation in a case against Justice Saqib Nisar. Mani on which they turned against him.
The purpose of writing a rough piece of judges performance is that judges who are filled with malice and arrogance, how can their decisions be fair?
In which clause of the constitution four or five judges have been given the power to remove the prime minister? When 58 2B ended, the generals and judges of the past hatched the unconstitutional innovation of ousting millions of people's elected prime ministers through the judiciary.
It should happen that just as General Musharraf has been given a symbolic punishment for imposing martial law, the pictures of the lords who play with the constitution should also be painted and their portraits should be removed from the chambers of the judiciary. Can lifting judges and generals be allowed to have privileges by allowing martial law? If the country is to be straightened, then at least they should be held accountable in a symbolic way.
What history has done with the arrogant and spiteful judges of the past should teach today's Lords to make decisions within the constitution, not to target politicians at the behest of the times.
Situations keep changing, the accountability of the past is happening today, so the accountability of today will be in the future. We are all accountable to history, judges, generals or journalists, all of us will have to account for our role in history. Future generations want us to be leaders, but for that we have to end hatred and anger.
0 Comments