How can Justice Faiz become a "good judge"!

photo file

The bat mark will not be on the ballot paper, which means Tehreek-e-Insaf as a political party is out of the February 8 elections. Now the candidates of the party will contest the elections in an independent position, that is, someone's election symbol will be a chair, then someone will contest the election on the symbol of a flower, someone will contest the election on the symbol of harmonium, then someone will have to ask for votes on many other election symbols like ship, fakhata, peacock. .


Inspite of having such great lawyers, Tehreek-e-Insaf lost its case in the Supreme Court, the intra-party election could not be conducted according to the legal requirements, nor could it satisfy the Election Commission, and in case of the bat sign being removed from above. Couldn't even take the batsman's mark. That is, Plan A of Tehreek-e-Insaf also failed and Plan B also failed, neither the caller nor the batsman.


For who is responsible for bringing Tehreek-e-Insaf to this situation, the leadership of Tehreek-e-Insaf including Imran Khan should point fingers at others and also look into their necks to see where the party and its leaders have made mistakes or blunders. happened


The absence of the bat symbol on the ballot paper has undoubtedly made the election controversial and it is regrettable that a major political party as a political party cannot participate in the election but two days into the case before the Supreme Court. After listening to the lengthy argument, one has no doubt that Tehreek-e-Insaaf's case was very weak, its lawyers had neither evidence nor strong legal points.


Now PTI can deceive themselves by badmouthing Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa and trolling him through their social media, but is it not true that there is no intra-party election despite being given a chance again and again? Done and when done, it was nothing but paperwork.


Legally, Tehreek-e-Insaaf's lawyers had nothing, so all the emphasis was put on the political aspect of the case and it was repeatedly said that depriving such a big political party of the electoral symbol is a great loss to politics, democracy and the system. Will be.


During the court proceedings, it was also said that if Tehreek-e-Insaf loses its election symbol, its candidates will still contest the election but as an independent.


The three-judge unanimous decision of the Supreme Court was legal in nature and ignored the political aspect, which accused a judge like Qazi Faiz of giving the decision at the behest of the establishment. .


If a political decision was made and the legal points were ignored, then it would be said that it is a political decision in which the law and the constitution were sidelined for the sake of a baby.


If Tehreek-e-Insaf had held intra-party elections two years ago, one year ago or six months ago, on the repeated request of the Election Commission, then this problem would not have arisen.


It should be remembered that this issue has been going on between the Election Commission and Tehreek-e-Insaaf since the time of Imran Khan's government and this was the time when the establishment stood behind Khan Sahib.


It is being said that why the Supreme Court gave this decision a month before the elections? Just think who is responsible for it? Did the Supreme Court take any sumoto? Heard the request of an opponent of Tehreek-e-Insaf? Or Tehreek-e-Insaaf gave a decision on its appeal which was submitted to the Supreme Court two or three days ago and it was requested that this appeal be heard immediately, for which the court had to sit for a full day even on Saturday. The timing of this decision was related to Tehreek-e-Insaaf's own decisions and actions.


Tehreek-e-Insaf is certainly facing many difficulties after the May 9 attack on the army and taking up the fight with the establishment, but it is futile to expect that Chief Justice Faiz Isa should fight the fight of Tehreek-e-Insaf with the establishment, giving him decisions against two or three generals. And Imran Khan should be taken out of jail and put in the chair of power, then he will be eligible to be called a good judge.


The past of Justice Faiz Isa is a witness that he does not take decisions under any pressure nor is he afraid of anyone including the establishment, but he also gave decisions against the establishment and references filed against him in Imran Khan's government with the alleged support of the establishment. And bravely resisted all attempts to harass him including his wife and proved all the allegations wrong in open court.


After becoming the Chief Justice, in the last few months, he opened difficult cases (which were suppressed in the files by the former Chief Justices) including the Faizabad dharna case related to the establishment and heard them in the open court and took action.


Justice Faiz's decision may be objected to, his decision may be wrong, but can such a judge fear Tehreek-e-Insaaf and its social media trolling and become a "good judge" for them.