6 years or 10 years?

photo file

Two models are emerging these days regarding the prosperity and future of the conflict land. There is a political model that the leaders of a possible political government have in mind.


This model is for ten years, in which the ruling party and that political party will work together for ten years so that the economic policies are followed for a long period of time, then there will be chances of prosperity in the country.


The second model is of authority. Although the prime minister heads the high-powered body called SIFC, it also has strong representation and patronage of the powerful.


It is said that if this model is found, the country will come out of the crisis in the first 3 years, and in the next three years, there will be an agricultural and economic revolution, from which the national train will start running at a gallop. As if under this model, this 6-year program is very necessary to fix and run the country.


If the thoughts of Noni leadership are explored, he believes that whether the country is facing an economic crisis or a political crisis, the only solution is development. Economic improvement can only come through rapid development of infrastructure, reduction in electricity cost and employment generation.


Noni minds are of the opinion that when Nawaz Sharif became the Chief Minister for the first time, the politics of Punjab revolved around the People's Party, Punjab used to be Larkana at one time, then according to the Noni leadership, they adopted the development model in 1990. He started breaking the spell of PPP and then there came a time when Punjab became the constituency of Gwalmandi for Non-League.


Noni says that if he gets the sincere support of Muqtadra, he will not only fix the country's economy in ten years, but also break the spell of Tehreek-e-Insaaf, according to him, the way he expelled the People's Party from Punjab. They can also give the country to Tehreek-e-Insaaf, just as it was expelled.


We journalists have not been able to have direct access to the thinking of the current military leadership, but according to the reports that are coming indirectly, the leadership has a feeling that the economy was on the path of development during the previous era of Nawaz Sharif. It was abolished and abused and the economic decline of the country began. The way in which the cases against Nawaz Sharif were made and the role played by the institutions are also serious concerns of the current military leadership.


The question is often raised in the journalistic circles that Nawaz Sharif could not be made with the previous 5 or 6 military chiefs, how can he be made with the current military leadership while now the space for civilian leadership is also very less.


The top leadership of Noon believes that the perception that Nawaz Sharif is not made up of military leaders is completely wrong. According to them, Nawaz Sharif tried his best to get along with the military leaders, but unfortunately, the military leaders of the past considered themselves to be above and beyond, so they could not get along with them.


Noon's top leadership believes that the current military chiefs are different from those of the past. They do not cheat and do what they say. Therefore, the Non-League believes that they can work together with the military leadership for the sake of the country's development. In this regard, Shahbaz Sharif has decided that he will perform the duties of the coordinator between the military chief and the prime minister.


Half of the columns were devoted to military and military plans and ambitions. Now let's review the plans of both of them.


The military plan is said to mean that the obstacles to the development of the country's economy should be removed by the military and political leadership together. But it has been seen in Contradistan that the politicians become completely ineffective in the committee or project in which Maqtadra joins and thus Maqtadra takes over all the affairs there. There is a difference between one and ten.


The authority is so powerful that wherever the military element is involved, the civilian influence is gradually lost. A balance of power between the civilian and the authority is necessary if the society is to run.


The thinking of SIFC will be positive, but for the improvement of agriculture, mining or other sectors, only military brains will not work, for this, professional and expert advisors are needed, which are nowhere to be seen at the moment. We have seen in the past that General Hameed Gul was made Foreign Policy Expert and General Tanveer Naqvi was given the task of improving the political system.


The result of General Hameed Gul's Afghan policy is that today we are being attacked from the same Afghanistan which we have helped for years, suffering economic and human losses. General Tanveer Naqvi gave a new system without involving the politicians, as soon as the politicians came, they overturned their system. The purpose of giving these examples of the past is that the final decisions about economy, agriculture and other technical matters should not be made by the army but should be consulted by international experts.


Similarly, the first objection to the program made by Nooni leadership is that no one gets a ten-year government in Contradistan, but here if they get three years, it is a spoil, so they should set up a short-term policy so that whatever They want to see the effects of the improvement quickly. Although Ishaq Dar is sincere and hard working, but the economic situation of the country has reached the level it has reached, a new approach and fresh blood is needed. Noni leadership is still relying on the old team.


Finally, it is requested from the political and military planners that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf should also be allowed to participate in the national and political stream. If the alienation continues with them, it is feared that the people of this new party of the country will adopt an attitude of indifference towards the state and politics and if this happens, it will be a great national loss.


Be it NGOs or military institutions, they should consider connecting society. Political stability is necessary for the improvement of the economy and political stability cannot come without giving justice to Tehreek-e-Insaf.